On the Production of $π^+π^+$ Pairs in pp Collisions at 0.8 GeV

EPJ manuscript No.

(will be inserted by the editor)

On the Production of tt+tt^ Pairs in pp Collisions at 0.8 GeV

o
o

X

S. Abd El-Samad^, R. Bilger^ K.-Th. Brinkmann^-io, H. Clement^ M. Dietrich^ E. Doroshkevich^ S.
Dsliemuchadse^'^, K. Ehrhardt*", A. Erhardt*', W. Eyrich^, A. Filippi^, H. Freiesleben^, M. Fritsch\ R. Geyer'*,
A. Gillitzer'', J. Hauffe^, D. Hesselbarth^, R. Jaekel^, B. Jakob^, L. Karsch^, K. Kilian"*, J. Kress*^, E. Kuhlmann^,
S. Marcello^ S. Marwinski'*, R. Meier^ K. Moller^ H.P. Morsch'*'^ L. Naumann^ J. Ritman"*, E. Roderburg'',
P. Schonmeier^'^, M. Schulte-Wissermann^, W. Schroeder^, F. Stinzing^, G.Y. Sun^, J. Wachter^, G.J. Wagner^,
M. Wagner^, U. Weidlich^ A. Wilms\ S. Wirth^, G. Zhang<^^, and R Zupranski^

^ Ruhr-Universitat Bochum, Germany

Technische Universitat Dresden, Germany
^ Friedrich-Alexander-Universitat Erlangen-Niirnberg, Germany
Forschungszentrum Jiilich, Germany
Forschungszentrum Rossendorf, Germany
Physikalisches Institut der Universitat Tubingen, Germany
University of Torino and INFN, Sezione di Torino, Italy
Atomic Energy Authority NRC Cairo, Egypt
Soltan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Warsaw, Poland
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn
(COSY-TOF Collaboration)

>

in
a^
o

cn

O
0^
O

June 17, 2009

Abstract. Data accumulated recently for the exclusive measurement of the pp — > pptt+tt" reaction at a
beam energy of 0.793 GeV using the COSY-TOF spectrometer have been analyzed with respect to possible
events from the pp nmr^it^ reaction channel. The latter is expected to be the only tttt production
channel, which contains no major contributions from resonance excitation close to threshold and hence
should be a good testing ground for chiral dynamics in the tttt production process. No single event has
been found, which meets all conditions for being a candidate for the pp — > nni^^n^ reaction. This gives an
upper limit for the cross section of 0.16 /ib (90% C.L.), which is more than an order of magnitude smaller
than the cross sections of the other two-pion production channels at the same incident energy.

PACS. 13.75.Cs - 14.20.Gk - 25.10.+S - 25.40. Bp

1 Introduction

The two-pion production in nucleon-nucleon collisions con-
nects TTTT dynamics with baryon and baryon-baryon de-
grees of freedom. As predicted by the pioneering work of
the Valencia group [2] the two-pion production process
in general is governed by excitation and decay of baryon
resonances. In systematic studies of two-pion production
channels by exclusive measurements of solid statistics at
CELSIUS [3ll4ll5| [6U7] and COSY p] it has been demon-
strated that the excitation of the Roper resonance and
its subsequent two-pion decay is the leading process near
threshold in pp — > pp7r"'"7r~ and pp ppir^Tr'^ channels. At
higher energies Tp > 1 GeV the AA process takes over the
leading role . In addition, the isospin decomposition of the
data available in all four pp initiated tttt channels ppn^ir^ ,

^ present address: Peking University
Correspondence to: H. Clement
email: clement@pit.physik.uni-tuebingen.de

pp-K^TT^ , pnTT+Tr" and nn7r+7r+ gives evidence for the ac-
tive role of another, higher-lying A resonance, most likely
the Z\(1600) [7j. The latter appears to be most dominant
in the nmr^n'^ channel at energies Tp > 1 GeV. At en-
ergies close to threshold the resonance contributions are
expected [2] to vanish in this channel. Hence, its near-
threshold cross section is predicted to be very small, how-
ever, most sensitive to non- resonant chiral terms |2j. This
situation therefore provides a unique chance to test chi-
ral dynamics in the two-pion production process on ex-
perimental data. The data base for the nn7r+7r+ chan-
nel is very sparse with just a few low-statistics bubble-
chamber results [9l fTQlfTT] and one exclusive measurement
at CELSIUS-WAS A [7]. All these data are taken in the
resonance region at energies Tp > 1 GeV, where the cross
section in this channel is already sizable. At low energies,
which are of interest here, no data exist so far for this
channel.

2

S. Abd El-Samad et al.: On the Production of tt n Pairs in pp Collisions at 0.8 GeV

2 Experiment

2.1 Detector setup

Since the experimental setup was discussed in detail al-
ready in Refs. [8 |fT2|ll3j . we give here only a short account.
The measurements were carried out at the Jiilich Cooler
Synchrotron COSY using the time-of-flight spectrometer
TOF at one of its external beam lines. The TOF spectrom-
eter was used in its short version, in order to minimze the
decay of pions before their arrival in the stop detectors and
to maximize the solid angle covered by the stop detectors
system consisting of Quirl with Central Calorimeter and
the Ring detector system. At the entrance to the detec-
tor system the beam - collimated to a diameter smaller
than 2 mm - hits the thin- walled LH2 target. At a dis-
tance of 22 mm downstream of the target the two layers
of the start detector were placed followed by a two-plane
fiber hodoscope and finally the TOF-stop detector sys-
tem at a distance of 1081 mm downstream the target.
The stop detector system consists in its central part of
the so-called Quirl, a 3-layer scintillator system followed
by the Central Calorimeter and in its peripheral part of
the so-called Ring, also a 3-layer scintillator system built
in a design analogously to the Quirl, however, with inner
and outer radii of 560 and 1540 mm, respectively. The
Quirl-Calorimeter system serves for the identification of
charged particles and of neutrons as well as for measur-
ing the energy of charged particles. The calorimeter con-
sists of 84 hexagon-shaped scintillator blocks of length 450
mm, which suffices to stop deuterons, protons and pions
of energies up to 400, 300 and 160 MeV, respectively. The
energy calibration of the calorimeter was performed by de-
tecting cosmic muons. The total polar angle coverage was
3° < 0^'^^ < 49° with the central calorimeter covering the
region 3° < 0^"'' < 28°.

2.2 Particle identification and event reconstruction

In the experiment the trigger suitable for the search for
nn7r+7r+ events required two hits in the Quirl and/or Ring
associated with two hits in the start detector. Tracks of
charged particles are reconstructed from straight-Hne fits
to the hit detector elements in start, fiber and stop detec-
tors. They are accepted as good tracks, if they originate
in the target and have a hit in each detector element the
track passes through. In this way the angular resolution
for charged tracks is better than 1° both in azimuthal and
in polar angles. If there is an isolated hit in the calorimeter
with no associated hits in the preceding detector elements,
this hit qualifies as a neutron candidate. In this case the
angular resolution of the neutron track is given by the size
of the hit calorimeter block, i.e. by 7 - 8°. For charged par-
ticles the energy resolution of the calorimeter is about 4%.
It is superior to that from time-of-fiight measurements due
to the short path length. However, for the Quirl and Ring
elements the time-of-fiight resolution is much better than
the AE resolution. Hence, for particle identification in the
Quirl-Calorimeter system we used the Quirl time-of-fiight

information together with the particle energy deposited
in the calorimeter [8l|1.2l,ll3]. In addition there is the de-
layed pulse technique [B] installed, which can be used to
positively identify 7r+ particles.

For the Ring system there is no particular particle
identification. However, the maximum possible laboratory
polar angle for nucleons emerging from two-pion produc-
tion events is « 30°. Therefore practically all these nu-
cleons are confined to the angular range of the Quirl-
Calorimeter system and identified there. Also due to their
large velocity the pions emerging from two-pion produc-
tion are separable to a large extent in the Ring from pro-
tons emerging from single-pion production.

The nmr'^Tr'^ channel is selected by identifying two
neutrons and two pions in the Calorimeter or alternatively
only one pion in the Calorimeter, when the second charged
track is in the Ring. The thus selected candidate events
have then finally been subjected to a kinematical fit. Since
all four-vectors of the ejectiles with the exception of the
neutron kinetic energies have been determined experimen-
tally, these fits have two overconstraints.

The absolute cross section is obtained by relative nor-
malization to the data for the pp7r+7r~ channel, which have
been obtained simultaneously in the experiment. Since the
phase space distributions for both reactions are essentially
identical, the only major difference lies in the efficiency of
proton versus neutron detection. The latter has been de-
termined as ~ 36% by measurement of the pp prnr^
reaction |13j .

3 Results

The final analysis of candidates for nn7r+7r+ events has
been performed in two ways. In the first most stringent
way we required that the two 7r+ candidates of an event
not only are identified by the time-of-fiight versus deposited-
energy information, but also by the delayed pulse tech-
nique requiring hits in the Calorimeter. As a result no
single event passed the required conditions.

Since the identification by the delayed pulse technique
has an efficiency of only 25% [3, if all four particles of
the event hit the Calorimeter, we have abstained from
requiring it furthermore. We can do so, since the selected
events are composed of exactly four tracks with two of
them being identified as neutral and two as charged. By
charge conservation the two detected charged tracks must
then be of positive charge.

With this relaxed condition, which increases the effi-
ciency for the detection of nri7r+7r+ events by more than
an order of magnitude since we also can use now the events
with one pion hit in the Ring detector, we reanalyzed all
possible events. Again we find no single candidate, which
meets all imposed conditions for being recognized as a
rtnTT+TT"'" event. This finding corresponds to an upper limit
for the total cross section of 0.16 fib (90% C.L.), which is
more than an order of magnitude smaller than that of the
other two-pion production channels pp7r+7r~, pp7r°7r° and
npTT+Tr" at Tp = 0.8 GeV.

S. Abd El-Samad et al.: On the Production of tt tv Pairs in pp Collisions at 0.8 GeV

3

In Fig.l we show the energy dependence of the total
cross section of the pp nn7r+7r+ reaction. Plotted are
all available data [9j[T0 lfTT1l7] including the result of this
work. They are compared to the theoretical calculations of
Ref. [2] as well as to the the cross section assumed for the
isospin decomposition of the two-pion production process
[7] (shaded band). The result of this work is compatible
with the extrapolation towards lower energies assumed in
the isospin decomposition work. It is presumably also in
good agreement with the Valencia model calculations. Un-
fortunately these calculations stop at a cross section of 1
lib in Ref. [2j. It should be noted that these calculations
fall low at high energies, since they do not include the
Z\(1600) excitation as pointed out in Ref. [7|. From the
energy dependence shown in Fig. 1 for the AA process,
which is qualitatively also followed by that of the zf\(1600)
process, we see that these resonance contributions die out
at low energies. The same is true for the process called
p.semi -pig, 1^ which denotes the Roper excitation with
subsequent single-pion decay and associated with a simul-
taneous non-resonant production of a second pion, graphs
(6) - (7) in Ref. [2]. The nonresonant contribution denoted
in Fig. 1 by a"'""^^" and corresponding to the so called chi-
ral terms given by the graphs (1) - (3) in Ref. [2j exhibits
a substantially smaller (phase space like) energy depen-
dence and hence is expected to be the dominant term in
the near-threshold region.

4 Summary

We have presented the first measurement of the pp
nnTT+Tr"*" reaction at Tp « 0.8 GeV. Though no single
event has been found, which meets all conditions for be-
longing to the pp — > nn7r+7r+ reaction process, it provides
an upper limit for the total cross section of 0.16 /i6 (90%
C.L.). This confirms the theoretical prediction that the
cross section is unusually small compared to the other two-
pion production channels, since resonance contributions
are supposed to vanish close to threshold in this chan-
nel. In consequence, this situation gives a unique access
to nonresonant chiral terms contributing to the two-pion
production process.

This work has been supported by BMBF(06TU261), DFG (Eu-
rop. GraduiertenkoUeg 683) and COSY-FFE(Forschungszentrum
Jiilich). We acknowledge valuable discussions with L. Alvarez-
Ruso, C. Hanhart, E. Oset and C. Wilkin.

10'

10^

10

10-^

™ I /' ^nonres
O ^

0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2

Tp [GeV]

Fig. 1. (color online) Energy dependence of the total cross
section for the pp nmr'^-K'^ reaction. The thick vertical
arrow represents the experimental result of this work. Open
symbols denote the previous measurements [QinOlITT] and the
solid circle the recent result from an exclusive measurement at
CELSIUS/ WAS A ^. The curves drawn show the predictions
of Ref. [2]. For non- and semi-resonant contributions they are
given by the dashed (0-"°"'"'=^: contributions from diagrams (1)
- (3) in Ref. [2]) and dash-dotted (cr"'^™': contributions from
diagrams (6) - (7) in Ref. [2]) lines. The dotted line denotes
the AA excitation process and the solid line the full calcula-
tion. The shaded band exhibits the cross section assumed for
the isospin decomposition [T]-

Phys. J. A35 (2008) 317
submitted to Phys.

Lett.:

6. T. Skorodko et al, Eur.

7. T. Skorodko et al.
arXiv:0906.30 87 [nucl-ex]

8. ^. Abd El-Bary et al,
arXiv:080O870 [nucl-ex]

9. F. Shimizu et al., Nucl. Phys. A386 (1982) 571

10. A. M. Eisner et al, Phys. Rev. 138 (1965) B670

11. E. Pickup, D.K. Robinson, E. O. Salant, Phys. Rev
(1961) 2091 (2002) 75

12. S. Abd El-Samad et al, Eur. Phys. J. A30, 443 (2006)

13. S. Abd El-Samad et al, Eur. Phys. J. A39, 281 (2009)

Eur. Phys. J. A37, 267 (2008);

125

References

1. M. Bashkanov et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 052301;
arXiv: 0806.4942 [nucl-ex]

2. L. Alvarez-Ruso, E. Oset, E. Hernandez, Nucl Phys. A633
(1998) 519 and priv. comm.

3. W. Brodowski et al., Phys.Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 192301

4. J. Patzold et al., Phys. Rev. C67 (2003) 052202(R)

5. J. Johanson et al, Nucl Phys. A712 (2002) 75